The system in detail

Features

A tour of every piece: pipeline variants, evidence classification, phase-gating, cross-session continuity, and the output artifacts you end up with.

01 · Pipeline variants

Six pipelines. Pick the depth that matches the job.

Every pipeline starts with architecture. From there, you choose how far to go. The default is a 7-phase full analysis with a split defect scan. Scale back when you only need orientation.

7 phases

Full with deep audit

Complete analysis with a two-pass defect scan. An early mechanical sweep catches surface-level issues; a later semantic pass re-examines defects with full contracts and protocols context before reimplementation planning.

  1. Architecture
  2. Defect scan (mechanical)
  3. Contracts
  4. Protocols
  5. Defect scan (semantic)
  6. Porting
  7. Reimplementation spec

The default pipeline. Best when you need the deepest defect analysis grounded in full behavioral understanding.

Phases form a DAG. Contracts and protocols can run in parallel after architecture. Porting waits for both. Reimplementation spec is last.

02 · Evidence classification

Every finding tagged with a confidence level.

An LLM can sound certain about things it inferred. CodeCartographer requires every finding to carry an evidence tag so you know what was observed, what was deduced, and what remains an open question.

🔍

Observed fact

Directly visible in source code or documentation. Not inferred.

🧠

Strong inference

Deduced from patterns and structure. High confidence but not directly stated.

⚠️

Portability hazard

Behavior or assumption that may not survive a rewrite or language change.

Open question

Could not determine from available sources. Needs human input or deeper analysis.

Discipline rule

If an LLM cannot classify a finding with one of these four tags, the finding is not specific enough to be useful. Vague assertions get rejected by the validation protocol.

03 · Phase-gating

No phase advances until the current output validates.

Each phase produces a structured output against a template. The validation protocol checks completion criteria: are all required sections present, are findings tagged with evidence levels, are open questions logged in status.yaml.

templates/

Output templates

Structured Markdown templates enforce consistent sections across projects and sessions. Every artifact has the same shape regardless of which LLM produced it.

VALIDATE.md

Validation protocol

Run after every phase. Checks that outputs match templates, evidence tags are applied, and partial results are logged properly before allowing the status to advance.

04 · Cross-session continuity

A fresh LLM session picks up exactly where the last one stopped.

Large codebases need multiple sessions. status.yaml is the single source of truth. A new session reads the guide, checks the status file, sees what is complete, and starts the next phase automatically. No explaining what happened before.

status.yaml

Mutable per-project state. Tracks phase completion, current phase, open questions, and the active pipeline. The only file that changes during a run.

THREAD_LOG.md

Cross-session summary log. Each session appends what it completed and what needs attention, giving the next session context beyond the machine-readable status file.

Pi-mono bonus

In Pi-mono, phase sub-agents persist transcripts alongside the orchestrator session. /resume, /tree, and /export browse them as first-class sessions with lineage back to the orchestrator.

05 · Output artifacts

The bundle you end up with.

Each artifact targets a different audience: engineers, reviewers, maintainers, and the next LLM session.

Architecture map

Layers, public surfaces, runtime lifecycle, dependency direction, porting priorities.

Defect report

Multi-pass scan: logic, error handling, concurrency, security, API drift, config risks.

Behavioral contracts

User-visible behavior, defaults, side effects, error modes, black-box acceptance checks.

Protocols and state

Events, state machines, persistence notes, compatibility hazards, internal message flow.

Porting bundle

Synthesis layer ranking what matters, what is risky, what needs special treatment in a rewrite.

Reimplementation spec

Language-agnostic build plan with modules, acceptance scenarios, and known unknowns.

Ready to try it on your own codebase?

Read the installation docs for drop-in setup, Pi-mono commands, or MCP server configuration.

Read the docs Download ZIP